The Good Book Company, 2019
In recent years, a significant attack on Christianity in the Western world and especially among the educated classes, can come from so-called “New Atheism”. Its most prominent proponent is Richard Dawkins.
Professor
John C. Lennox is arguably the most prominent opponent of the New Atheism. This is unsurprising from his resume—a
professor at Oxford, unapologetically Christian, albeit not a young-earth creationist (unfairly
dismissed as belonging to the species called “fundamentalists”). Lennox has debated
with great success against a large number of atheists: Dawkins, Laurence
Krauss, and the late Christopher Hitchens among others. His books may sell far
fewer copies than Dawkins, but he has sufficient notoriety that he got an
invitation to ABC’s Q&A when in
Australia.
Those
familiar with his work should know up front—there is nothing new in Can science explain everything? As
declared in the book’s introduction, Lennox’s purpose was to provide a concise
and accessible form of his various arguments, which are found in greater detail
in his other books. He achieved this. The book can easily be read over two
evenings.
The
first few chapters provide an explanation of why science and religion are not irreconcilable. Here he lays out in plain
language that reason and religion are not alternatives. In fact, he
demonstrates that atheists are frequently willing to act in a manner contrary
to their own supposed position of rationality and impartiality, when they are
defending their own faith.
The
last few chapters provide a defence of the specific claims of Christianity
against the main objections posed against it. He provides evidence for the
historical reliability of the Bible and the resurrection. Here I found that
sometimes ‘concise’ became ‘too
concise’.
His
description of how the Bible can be interpreted with deference to context and
genre, was sometimes difficult to follow. He also summarised his idea that
there is room in the first chapter of Genesis for time gaps. Anyone familiar
with Genesis 1 would emerge from this discussion with more questions than answers
about the idea; this book is a concise overview, so he didn’t have words to
address the obvious objections.
His
arguments for the resurrection were all common and well-known, but necessarily
they were cherry-picked from the vast amount of speculation that exists, in
order to keep the book short. I wondered whether some contemporary readers,
being very ignorant of the bible, may lack sufficient background knowledge to
understand some of his arguments.
In
the final two chapters, Lennox covers the Gospel. He explains this first from a
personal anecdote and then ensures that the uncompromised message of the gospel
is given clearly, before inviting his readers to test the gospel
‘scientifically’.
The
brevity of this book is both its strength and its weakness. Overall, I would
recommend it as an overview of the problems with the New Atheism. If you have
friends who have read Dawkins, they owe it to themselves to read this – and it
won’t even take long. If they have an appetite for his longer works, however, God’s Undertaker and Gunning for God are more comprehensive.
Over
the many years that Lennox has spent teaching and debating the topics of
atheism and science, through his affiliation with Ravi Zacharias’ ministry, and
also through his several books, he has certainly had a strong positive impact
on many, many people. Equally certainly, God is able to use this book in the
same way.
Like this:
Like Loading...